Finished must-be-done items. Let's relax for the rest of the day.
As I looked at the number of contestants who solved the problem, it seemed that it was not as difficult as I thought.
Codeforces Round 965 (Div. 2) Editorial
We can always construct a solution such that the number of pairs
(i, j)
is 1 where the only pair is(1, n)
.
There exists several constructions, such as rotating
p
once or increment allpi
(andpi = n
turns intopi = 1
).
Consider the former construction, where
q = [p2, p3, ..., pn, p1]
. For an arbitrarily interval[i, j]
,p[i..j]
and[i..j]
will have exactly 1 element that's different, disregarding ordering.
That totally makes sense now.
"""
one of the possible solutions
"""
for _ in range(int(input())):
n: int = int(input())
p: list[int] = list(map(int, input().split()))
q = [p[-1]] + p[:-1]
print(" ".join([str(x) for x in q]))
Ketone 0 mg/dl I drank too much water today and I suspect that makes the denominator very large, so that the mg/dl became nearly zero, but not sure
Salad 40g Protein shake 20g
Total carbohydrate 60 g
MUST:
TODO: